Automating and Scaling App Protection with Azure Devops

September 10, 2018 4280 Views Gabriel Torok

Prevention, detection, and response

Today, Microsoft announced Azure DevOps – Loosely, it is TFS and VSTS, with its services broken out into distinct components that can be used together or separately. The Azure DevOps services are Azure Boards, Azure Repos, Azure Pipelines, Azure Test Plans and Azure Artifacts. When Azure DevOps was VSTS and TFS, we supported integration with PreEmptive’s Dotfuscator. Today, none of that changes. As Azure DevOps evolves, we will continue to improve our integration, so that you can easily add multi-layered protection to your valuable apps.

In Mindset shift to a DevSecOps culture, Buck Hodges, Director of Engineering for Visual Studio Team Services, stressed the importance of both preventing breaches and “assuming breaches. ”In essence, prevention only gets you part of the way there. “Assuming a breach” allows for effective incident detection, response and recovery process planning.

PreEmptive’s protection tools (Dotfuscator and DashO) easily integrate with your Azure DevOps process, hardening your applications by injecting controls such as:

Anti-Reverse Engineering
Anti-Tampering
Anti-Inspection
Anti-Compromised Device

Hardened applications can respond to attacks by executing standard or customized behaviors. For example, an application could simply exit, or it could send security related messages to an Azure analytics platform such as Visual Studio App Center. In addition to helping satisfy PCI, NIST, and other guidelines, this strategy also lines up with the OWASP mobile recommendation to shut down an app running on a rooted device, to prevent compromise.

For sensitive or high value applications, organizations in virtually every industry are incorporating application hardening and obfuscation into their DevOps process. Along with using other application security practices this can create a DevSecOps process. I will have a future blog with more information on DevSecOps.

What now?

Learn more about securing and protecting your mobile, service, and desktop components with PreEmptive Protection and Azure DevOps, and get a free evaluation of application protection here.

In addition, a free tool called Dotfuscator Community is included in Visual Studio. It is easy to add to your Azure DevOps process via a free extension available here: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=PreEmptiveSolutions.dotfuscator-ce-vsts

PreEmptive Solutions is committed to deepening and broadening its integration into Azure DevOps alongside other Azure DevOps partners such as Mobilize and Progress.

To learn more about #AzureDevOps see https://aka.ms/azurevsts.

The Secret to Effective In-App Protection

Gartner calls In-App Protection “crucial” in their July 2019 Market Guide for In-App Protection In-App Protection. The guide’s summary advises security and risk management leaders to “take due care in protecting their application clients” in order to avoid “security failure.”

This raises the question – what constitutes “due care?” Obviously, no development organization looks to recklessly expose their applications or sensitive data to attack or compromise. On the other hand, over-engineered (or poorly engineered) security controls can quickly lead to excessive development costs, performance and quality issues, and, ultimately, unacceptable user experiences. While terms and terminology may vary, there is broad consensus on how to best define “due care” for any given application/user scenario.

If you don’t follow application security closely, you might think of application obfuscation and symbol renaming as being synonymous – and with good reason. Many platforms and languages, like .NET, Java, and JavaScript have popular obfuscators that do little else--our own Dotfuscator Community Edition for .NET and ProGuard for Java are good examples. However, obfuscation is far more than symbol renaming – and in-app protection is far more than obfuscation. Much of this expansion has been driven by new security requirements, shifting attack vectors, the rise of mobile and IoT computing and, lastly, the growing recognition inside regulations and legislation of the exposure that can result from inadequately protected software.

PreEmptive has partnered with Microsoft for 16 years and we’ve been involved with .NET since before version 1.0 shipped. From that perspective, it’s hard for us to pinpoint a time where the energy and enthusiasm in the .NET community has been higher than it is now. Over the past few years, Microsoft has put together the annual .NET Conf, completely online with viewers, participants, and local events all over the world. The event is virtual and streamed live over three days.

The big news at this year's .NET Conf was the launch of .NET Core 3, the next step in the continued evolution of .NET. .NET Core 3 is a huge effort, with many moving parts, and Microsoft announced many related releases to support it. Highlights for us included:

Search for lockpicking and you’ll see that there’s no shortage of suppliers ready to serve locksmiths and hobbyists, each community having a perfectly legitimate need. Is there any reason to believe that burglars don’t shop the same sites?

Hackers are developers and they have a long history of enthusiastically embracing and adapting development (and DevOps) innovations to speed their work, extend their reach, and ship software – the only difference is that they’re more likely to use those development tools and platforms on YOUR software rather than on their own. Static code analysis tools, debuggers, and even public bug tracking databases are all go-to hacker resources.

Can you tell the difference? Exception or the norm?

Of course, everyone is “for security” in principle. The hard question that each organization has to answer for themselves is “how much is enough?” Over-engineering is (by definition) excessive, and over-engineering application security can, in fact, be devastating as overly-complex algorithms, architectures and processes can compromise user experience, degrade performance and slow development velocity. On the other hand, punishment is swift for organizations that cut corners and do not effectively secure their applications, their data and, most importantly their users and business stakeholders. Finding and maintaining that balance can be time consuming and, because you can never be sure you’ve gotten it exactly right, it can also be a thankless job.

Automating and Scaling App Protection with Azure Devops

Prevention, detection, and response

The Secret to Effective In-App Protection

Symbol Renaming: App Security’s Maginot Line?

Highlights from .NET Conf 2019

Tools don’t hack apps, hackers do: Securing Android apps against Frida

Trusted Computing: Panacea or Magical Thinking?

Can you tell the difference? Exception or the norm?

Latest Blog Posts

The Secret to Effective In-App Protection

Symbol Renaming: App Security’s Maginot Line?

Highlights from .NET Conf 2019

Tools don’t hack apps, hackers do: Securing Android apps against Frida

Trusted Computing: Panacea or Magical Thinking?

Twitter